The hugely talented Mr Weatherley


Brian's B2B blog...

Welcome to my B2BMediaTraining blog – some small thoughts on life, the universe and dealing with the press from someone who crossed over from practitioner to teacher.  The following selection of short articles provides an off-beat (and unashamedly tongue-in-cheek) insight into the many different aspects of the media, along with hints and tips for better communication and an understanding into what gets journalists reaching for their pens, tablets or smartphones to cover your story...


Posts in the topic of 'How easy is it to reach you?'...



Good news or old news?

Visit the website of any major company (it might even be a competitor) and assuming there is one click-on the section marked ‘News.’ How current is the most recently posted story? A week old? A month old? I’ve frequently noticed so-called news stories on website that are over a year old. What impression do you think that gives a journalist searching for information? The impression it gives me is that there’s not much happening, and certainly nothing worth calling up about. But is that a true reflection of the situation? It could simply be that keeping the news section of the website current isn’t the top priority for the webmaster. Either way, it’s worth reflecting upon, and re-visiting your own website.

In my regular trawl around corporate websites it’s also noticeable how webmasters confuse features for news. Or to put it another way you’ve got to look hard to find any ‘news’ in the story, which all-too often tends to be another of the ‘Customer buys one of our existing products…and generally seems quite happy with it’ genre. Hardly what I’d call news as a former journalist. If they were unhappy with it…now that WOULD be news!




However, a strong and current news section shouldn’t be the only reason why a journalist should visit your website. The best sites go a lot further, providing excellent ‘Thought Leadership’ content that examines the broader aspects of the specific marketplace a particular company is competing in, like generic industry data, latest market stats, research material, insightful commentary of new legislation or regulations, all of which provide that all important thing for a journalist―context. Those same sites also tend to feature regularly updated blogs, downloadable podcasts, tweets and YouTube videos. Anything to capture, and keep, the media’s attention. But whatever you do provide on your website what you see first should always be current.

Do you use your website as a platform for that kind of useful media content? Or is it just a shop window for your products and services? There’s nothing wrong with the latter, especially if a journalist is only after some basic facts-and-figures. But It’s surely a missed opportunity to stop there. Within any organization there are usually some highly-knowledgeable individuals who can provide the kind of market knowledge, context, and wisdom that journalists are desperate to get hold of, and leverage in their stories. The obvious analogy is with those financial analysts who produce regular market updates and research studies that are snapped-up by the media. And guess who gets a name check along the way? Actually, you don’t need to guess as it’s pretty obvious!

If you do want your website to be a gateway to the media and starting point for conversations with journalists (and as PR resources are stretched ever thinner websites are a cost-effective way of getting strong messages over to the press) then whether it’s the latest news, insight, or unique market research, make sure you give them something to think about…and use. And the more you provide, the more likely they are to keep coming back to you.



Please hold caller....

How easy is it for a journalist to talk to you or your company…especially if they’ve never spoken to you before? Who in your organization is the best person to kick-start a conversation with the media and how far do they go out of their way to be accessible? Any journalist looking to get a quick heads-up on your business will inevitably go to your website as it’s by far the most convenient starting point.

Assuming they like what they see and want to find out more they’ll doubtless hit the ‘contact us’ button on your home page. And then what do they find? A direct landline number for your switchboard? A dedicated number and the name of the person for ‘media-enquiries’? Or an anonymous e-mail set-up with a box for enquiries and a ‘I am not a robot’ prompt to tick? Not exactly ‘user-friendly’. How long will it then take before someone bothers to reply―assuming the journalist in question hasn’t already lost interest and moved on?




Your website is the World’s window to your business, so why pull the blinds down and make it hard for any member of the Fourth Estate to interact with you? Of course, you may not like the idea of journalists ringing you up out of the blue. You may prefer to only talk to the media when it suits you. At least that way there’s a chance you’ll be in control when it comes to releasing information. If that’s your attitude good luck. Only don’t be surprised if a rival starts getting all the attention simply because they made themselves more available when the press came calling.

If you’re under the impression that the only time a journalist wants to call you is to ask awkward questions, you’re rather missing the point of press relationships. They could just as easily be calling to find out about a successful business deal, a new contract or project, or a recent major product launch. In short, they could be looking for some good news that could be read, heard, or seen by potential customers or indeed anyone else. Then again, they might want some ‘Thought Leadership’ from you on what’s happening in your market, the trends in your business, or the effect of forthcoming legislation on your industry. Unfortunately, it’s hard to be a Thought Leader if you’re hard to reach.

A journalist working to a tight deadline won’t warm to an organization whose default position on press enquiries is an answerphone message that constantly states: ‘The person you’re calling isn’t available right now, please leave a message and we’ll deal with it on our return…’ And then you don’t. If you think a chatbot could handle your press enquiries better, try it. It might work. But then again it probably won’t. Meanwhile, an organization or business that goes out of its way to be easily accessible to the media via as many routes as possible and responds quickly to press enquiries will stand a better chance of getting coverage than one that prefers to erect barriers to good communication. Which one are you?